By Howie Katz
Renee Good shooting off her mouth at ICE agents just before the shooting
Let
me start off by saying that I'm not defending what Renee Good did. Nor
am I accusing ICE agent Jon Ross of murder like many people in
Minneapolis and other places are doing. And I sure as hell don't want
cast any aspersions on our brave police officers who put their lives on
the line every day while protecting America's citizens. But the shooting
of Renee Good smells and the stench is giving rise to questions about
good and bad shootings by police officers.
Sometimes good cops do
stupid things. I'm reminded of the cop who parked his patrol car across
the railroad tracks and got out to wave his arms in an effort to stop a
speeding train. Fortunately, he was able to jump out of the way just in
time, but the patrol car ended up as a pile of junk nearly a mile down
the tracks.
Another stupid thing cops do - and they do this far
too often - is to position themselves in front of a car occupied by a
driver who has committed or is committing some sort of offense. I always
taught officers to never ever stand in front of a car under such
circumstances.
Quite often you hear about officers shooting a
driver for deliberately trying to run them down. But the truth is that
the driver was just trying to get away and had no intention of trying to
run anyone down. Is a shooting in such a case justified? Legally yes,
but morally maybe not. The question is, was the shooting really
necessary? A car is not going to stop the instant its driver is shot
dead, as was the case with Renee Good, whose car kept driving for about a
block until it smashed into some parked cars.
Responding
to criticism of the Renee Good shooting, Vice President JD Vance
attacked the "corporate media" for its coverage of the shooting, saying
that it was an "absolute disgrace." Vance said the ICE officer was
clearly justified in shooting Good because he was clearly acting in
self-defense. He maintained that her death was "of her own making." If
anything was an absolute disgrace, it was the remarks Vance made without knowing what actually took place.
Apparently
the FBI does not agree with Vance because on Friday one of its special
response teams raided the home of Jon Ross. They were seen leaving
with five large plastic crates, a computer tower and a stack of picture
frames. They would not have done that had the shooting been clearly
justified.


FBI agents are pictured hauling items from the home of Jon Ross
Furthermore, Kristi Noem demonstrated that she is not fit to be Secretary of Homeland Security. She made the absurd charge that Renee Good committed an "act of
domestic terrorism" by what she did. Noem also said Jon Ross "followed
his training" when he shot Good. Followed his training? God help the
ICE agents if they are trained to position themselves in front of a car
when confronting its driver.
It is true that Good's death was of her own making, but that does not necessarily justify the shooting.
While it may be legally justified, this was a bad
shooting because it was not really necessary. The officer should not
have been in a position where he could be run over. And shooting the
driver would not have stopped the car immediately.
Renee Good was
a disgusting anti-ICE protester who was trying to obstruct an ICE operation, but she was not a dangerous criminal whose escape
would have jeopardized the safety of the public. Ross, on the other
hand, was a true American hero, having served this country in Iraq. It's
a shame that his mistake has caused people to accuse him of murder. And despite Vance's defense, Ross may end up facing criminal charges.
The only thing good about this shooting is that Renee Good was white and not black.
Had she been black, there would have been mass protests and destruction
of property throughout the country. Former Houston police chief Art
Acevedo would have knelt with and hugged the protesters. Race-baiter Al
Sharpton would have conducted Good's funeral. And law enforcement would
have suffered another serious blow to its reputation.