News And Unusual Events That May Not Be Widely Circulated By The Media Plus An Occasional Bit Of Humor. A BarkGrowlBite Publication Which Refuses To Be Politically Correct. (Copyrighted articles are reproduced in accordance with the copyright laws of the U.S. Code, Title 17, Section 107.)
Sunday, January 16, 2022
Saturday, January 15, 2022
TRASHING THE ROYALS IS FAR WORSE THAN SCREWING A 17-YEAR-OLD GIRL
Queen Elizabeth strips Prince Andrew of his military and royal titles
By Howie Katz
Prince Andrew has been embroiled in an embarrassing scandal over his close friendship with sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein. Andrew has also been sued by Virginia Giuffre for raping her three times when she was only 17. During a BBC interview Andrew denied ever having any sex with her and called Giuffre a publicity-hungry liar who made up her claims of sexual assault for a payday.
Andrew, 41, pictured with Virginia Giuffre in Ghislaine Maxwell's London home where she claimed he raped her three times when she was only 17
The
Queen, his mother, stripped Andrew of his titles just one day after US
District Judge Lewis Kaplan ruled the Giuffre's lawsuit can go on.
Then
I'm not defending Prince Andrew, but when one hears that he "sexually assaulted" Virginia Giuffre, they immediately picture him as brutally forcing himself on a young unwilling girl who is screaming no or stop it.
Now, Andrew did break the law by screwing an underage girl. It used to be known as statuary rape, meaning that it is against the law to have sex, consensual or not, with an underage girl, the age is set arbitrarily by each state, mostly at 18.
Here's something else to consider. when the ages were set, it was believed that a girl under 18 did not have the capability of deciding to have sex. But in these times girls are having consensual sex at 15 or younger, and the only time an offending male is prosecuted is when the girl's parents file a complaint with the police.
So, shame, shame on Prince Andrew. But stripping Andrew of his royal and military titles seems to be way to harsh. Ten lashes with a wet noodle would have been sufficient.
And the Queen should not have been upset by Andrew's friendship with sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein. After all, both Bill Clinton and Donald Trump were close friends of Epstein.
As for Giuffre, in the above picture, she looks more like a young woman
in her 20s than a 17-year-old girl. And Andrew did not deflower her.
You can bet that when she and Andrew hooked up together, she was an
'experienced' teen. While I do believe Giuffre is telling the truth, she's doing so to score a big 'payday' as Andrew charged.
If the Queen wants to strip a royal of his titles, she should start with prince Harry. What he did is fare worse than screwing a 17-year old girl.

Oprah Winfrey has reportedly sold the interview to US broadcaster CBS for $7-9 million
Harry and the trollop that got her gold digging claws into the prince trashed the Royals during a lengthy TV interview with Oprah Winfrey. Both claimed the Royals were racists among other degrading allegations. That caused a crisis within the Monarchy
In addition to the bombshell Oprah interview, Harry has left merry old England to take up permanent residence in the United States.
So, who should have been stripped of their Royal and military titles ... Andrew or Harry? Both embarrassed the Royals, but Harry should have been stripped of his titles because he publicly trashed the royal family.
Thursday, December 30, 2021
Wednesday, December 22, 2021
Saturday, December 4, 2021
A FLYING PIG MUST HAVE PULLED THE TRIGGER ..... IF NOT THE PIG, THEN THE TOOTH FAIRY MUST HAVE DONE IT
Alex Baldwin insists he never pulled the trigger of the gun. Claims he pulled back the hammer of the vintage Colt 45, and when he let go of the hammer, the gun went off
By Howie Katz
Alec is holding a gun! ... Quick everyone, run for cover!
Unless you live under a rock you should know that on October 21, 2021Alec Baldwin accidentally killed cinematographer Halyna Hutchins and wounded director Joel Souza with a prop gun on a movie set near Santa Fe, New Mexico.
To begin with, Hutchins and Souza would not have been shot had Baldwin not violated the cardinal rule of gun safety: Never point a gun - loaded or empty, real or fake - at anyone unless you intend to kill them.
The gun fired by Baldwin was an Itakian made replica of a vintage Colt 45 similar to the one pictured here
During an interview with ABC's George Stephanopoulos, Baldwin insists he never pulled the trigger of the gun. Claims he pulled back the hammer of the vintage Colt 45, and when he let go of the hammer, the gun went off.
Several gun experts say that the gun might possibly go off like Baldwin claimed, but such an accidental discharge is so rare, that the actor is "full of shit."
However, Baldwin is an outspoken Democrat, so he wouldn't lie about how the gun went off. But if not Baldwin, who would have pulled the trigger?
An angry flying pig must have pulled the trigger.
And if not the pig, then the tooth fairy must have done it.
Unless he can prove a flying pig or the tooth fairy pulled the trigger, Baldwin should be charged and tried for manslaughter (Hutchins) and attempted manslaughter (Souza).
If convicted, Baldwin should be sentenced to serve time in prison instead of being put on probation. A small price to pay for killing one person and wounding another.
ADDENDUM: By
the way, if that tooth fairy is still buzzing around inside or outside
your head, you can call on the fella pictured below for help.
Wednesday, December 1, 2021
LAST WORDS OF NAZI U-BOAT COMMANDER AND CREW
By Howie Katz
On this day in 1942, U-692 left its pen in in La Rochelle, France to sink allied supply ships in the North Atlantic.
Three days later the U-692 was spotted by a British frigate ans although the U-boat was able to submerge, it was severely damaged by a depth charge and began to fill with water.
As the water got up to his head, the U-boat commander shouted:
Heil Hitler! Auf Wiedersehen mein Fuhrer.
Only a few of the crew was still alive, but they shouted back:
Auf Wiedersehen ... Fuck der Fuhrer!





![U-576 crew members. “They [the crew] are chipper in a rough kind of way, satisfied with their lot, and proud of their work.” Hunt in the Atlantic by H. Busch. U-576 crew members. “They [the crew] are chipper in a rough kind of way, satisfied with their lot, and proud of their work.” Hunt in the Atlantic by H. Busch.](https://oceanexplorer.noaa.gov/explorations/16battlefield/logs/sept4/media/friends_800.jpg)